GATES and ANOR (trading as ELIAS GATES AND ASSOCIATES) v STRANGE [1997] NSWCA 120
It was purposeless to grant leave as the basis upon which the Costs Assessor proceeded, or appeared to have proceeded, was correct: the work claimed was of no value to the Opponent and nil assessment was appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimants: Gates and Anor (trading as Elias Gates & Associates); Opponent: Strange
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Master’s Decision on Appeal From Costs Assessor’s Determination
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Professional Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gates and Anor (trading as Elias Gates & Associates)
Claimants
Strange
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Master’s Decision on Appeal From Costs Assessor’s Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Costs Assessor was required to give reasons for assessment
- 2 Whether any of the costs or expenses claimed had value to the Opponent
Ratio Decidendi
It was purposeless to grant leave as the basis upon which the Costs Assessor proceeded, or appeared to have proceeded, was correct: the work claimed was of no value to the Opponent and nil assessment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- Summons be dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment