Whitby v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 201

Whitby v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 201

Applicants' failure to accept the Calderbank settlement offer was not unreasonable under s 570(2)(b) due to insufficient time for proper consideration; however, proceedings against third respondent (Mr Dixon) were instituted without reasonable cause under s 570(2)(a) as no evidence or material facts reasonably established he was 'knowingly concerned' in alleged contraventions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs / Post Dismissal; Costs Hearing
Outcome
Application for costs partially allowed; costs awarded to third respondent only
Legal Topics
['costs Application' 'fair Work Act' 'indemnity Costs' 'employee/contractor Distinction' 'knowingly Concerned Liability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Costs / Post Dismissal; Costs Hearing

  1. 1 ["Whether applicants' failure to accept Calderbank offer was unreasonable under Fair Work Act s 570(2)(b)" 'Whether proceedings were instituted against third respondent without reasonable cause under Fair Work Act s 570(2)(a)' 'Whether third respondent should be awarded indemnity costs']

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants' failure to accept the Calderbank settlement offer was not unreasonable under s 570(2)(b) due to insufficient time for proper consideration; however, proceedings against third respondent (Mr Dixon) were instituted without reasonable cause under s 570(2)(a) as no evidence or material facts reasonably established he was 'knowingly concerned' in alleged contraventions.

Court Disposition

Application for costs partially allowed; costs awarded to third respondent only

Orders

  • ['Applicants pay the costs of the third respondent' "Respondents' application for costs otherwise dismissed"]