Application by Paul Anthony Armstrong under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 [1983] FCA 285
The Federal Court appeal was a Federal appeal that succeeded on a question of law, no statutory provision precluded the grant of a certificate, and the discretionary matters against relief did not require refusal. It was therefore appropriate to grant a section 6 certificate limited to the applicant's costs of the appeal in the Federal Court, but not to costs of the Supreme Court proceedings already covered by an order against the informant or to any appellant's costs because the applicant had not been ordered to pay them.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Application for a Costs Certificate Under Section 6 of the Federal Proceedings (costs) Act 1981 / Federal Court of Australia, General Division, After a Full Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
- Outcome
- Application granted; costs certificate issued to Paul Anthony Armstrong.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Certificate' 'federal Appeal Succeeding on a Question of Law' 'roadside Breath Screening Device Approval' 'sequence of Appeals' 'discretion to Grant Costs Certificate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for a Costs Certificate Under Section 6 of the Federal Proceedings (costs) Act 1981 / Federal Court of Australia, General Division, After a Full Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal to the Federal Court was a Federal appeal that succeeded on a question of law within section 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981.' 'Whether any statutory bar or discretionary consideration should prevent the grant of a costs certificate.' "Whether the certificate should extend beyond the applicant's costs of the appeal in the Federal Court."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court appeal was a Federal appeal that succeeded on a question of law, no statutory provision precluded the grant of a certificate, and the discretionary matters against relief did not require refusal. It was therefore appropriate to grant a section 6 certificate limited to the applicant's costs of the appeal in the Federal Court, but not to costs of the Supreme Court proceedings already covered by an order against the informant or to any appellant's costs because the applicant had not been ordered to pay them.
Court Disposition
Application granted; costs certificate issued to Paul Anthony Armstrong.
Orders
- ['The Court grants to the applicant, Paul Anthony Armstrong, a certificate in terms of section 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under the Act to the applicant in respect of costs incurred by the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment