Clancy v Prince & 2 Ors [2001] NSWSC 164
Plaintiff was not entitled to indemnity costs, as defendants' conduct did not reach the threshold of being plainly unreasonable. The ordinary rule for costs on party/party basis applies. Proceedings properly commenced in Supreme Court due to declaratory relief and complexity/novelty of legal issues (contribution and s55(2A) of Conveyancing Act).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Costs recoverable on party/party basis by purchaser (plaintiff); costs order against all three defendants on equal basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Determination' 'indemnity Costs' 'party/party Costs' 'declaratory Relief' 'jurisdiction' 'contribution Between Defendants' 'misrepresentation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded against the defendants' 'Applicability of Supreme Court Rules Pt 52A r33 to costs' 'Jurisdiction of Supreme Court versus District Court' 'Effect of Calderbank-type settlement offer' 'Liability of Second and Third Defendants for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff was not entitled to indemnity costs, as defendants' conduct did not reach the threshold of being plainly unreasonable. The ordinary rule for costs on party/party basis applies. Proceedings properly commenced in Supreme Court due to declaratory relief and complexity/novelty of legal issues (contribution and s55(2A) of Conveyancing Act).
Court Disposition
Costs recoverable on party/party basis by purchaser (plaintiff); costs order against all three defendants on equal basis.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff entitled to recover costs against all three defendants on equal party/party basis.' 'No indemnity costs awarded against any defendant.' 'Orders and declarations in paragraphs 1 to 6 followed from judgment.' 'Third cross-claim procedural directions dealt with separately.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment