Nguyen v Grippaudo [2017] NSWSC 1209
No order as to costs was appropriate because, in circumstances where there was no determination on the merits and the second defendant had no interest in the substantive dispute, requiring him to pay costs would be inappropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Declarations and Orders by Consent; No Order as to Costs
- Outcome
- Declarations and orders made by consent; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs—final Decision Not Made on Merits' 'offer to Settle—party Required to Approach Court' 'costs Where Dispute Resolved by Consent' 'party Obliged to Be Joined But No Real Interest in Merits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Declarations and Orders by Consent; No Order as to Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event when no hearing on the merits' 'Whether the court should determine unresolved factual or legal questions only as they affect costs']
Ratio Decidendi
No order as to costs was appropriate because, in circumstances where there was no determination on the merits and the second defendant had no interest in the substantive dispute, requiring him to pay costs would be inappropriate.
Court Disposition
Declarations and orders made by consent; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Declarations made in terms of paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the short minutes of order initialled and dated 4 September 2017' 'Orders made as per paragraphs 2 and 9 of the short minutes of order' 'No order as to costs' "Plaintiff's affidavit exhibit to be handed back"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment