Walters v Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) [2007] FCA 1403
Because the Commissioner of Taxation was successful in both Applications and David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters accepted that no special circumstances altered the usual order for costs, they were ordered to pay the Commissioner's costs of and incidental to each Application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeals From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Costs Ruling / Determination of Reserved Question of Costs Following Judgment in Walters V Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1270
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to the Commissioner of Taxation.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Following Event' 'special Circumstances' 'appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeals From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Costs Ruling / Determination of Reserved Question of Costs Following Judgment in Walters V Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1270
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters should pay the Commissioner of Taxation's costs of and incidental to Applications QUD8 of 2006 and QUD10 of 2006."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Commissioner of Taxation was successful in both Applications and David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters accepted that no special circumstances altered the usual order for costs, they were ordered to pay the Commissioner's costs of and incidental to each Application.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to the Commissioner of Taxation.
Orders
- ['David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation of and incidental to Applications QUD8 of 2006 and QUD10 of 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment