Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2007] NSWCA 121

Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2007] NSWCA 121

The primary judge correctly applied the statutory standards of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967; considering all relevant evidence and competing accounts, it was reasonable for the prosecution to institute proceedings even if all relevant facts were known at the outset. The failure to grant a certificate was justified, and alleged bias or procedural unfairness was not demonstrated.

Parties
Claimant: George David Mordaunt; First Opponent: District Court of New South Wales; Second Opponent: Director of Public Prosecutions
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Certificate for Costs Under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967
Outcome
Amended summons dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Costs in Criminal Cases, Apprehended Violence Orders, Procedural Fairness, Apprehended Bias, Judicial Discretion in Costs Certificates
Criminal Law Costs Costs in Criminal Cases Apprehended Violence Orders Procedural Fairness Apprehended Bias Judicial Discretion in Costs Certificates

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George David Mordaunt

Claimant

District Court of New South Wales

First Opponent

Director of Public Prosecutions

Second Opponent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Certificate for Costs Under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the primary judge failed to exercise discretion properly under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 s 3
  2. 2 Whether proper and adequate reasons were given for exercise of discretion in regards to 'Facts Issue'
  3. 3 Whether the primary judge erred in considering unsupported statements and extraneous matters, leading to miscarriage of discretion

Ratio Decidendi

The primary judge correctly applied the statutory standards of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967; considering all relevant evidence and competing accounts, it was reasonable for the prosecution to institute proceedings even if all relevant facts were known at the outset. The failure to grant a certificate was justified, and alleged bias or procedural unfairness was not demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Amended summons dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Amended summons dismissed
  • Costs awarded against claimant