Melhelm Pty Ltd, in the matter of Boka Beverages Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Boka Beverages Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1809
The general purpose liquidators did not act unreasonably in opposing the appointment of special purpose liquidators: their opposition was vindicated as to Icon Brewing, Melhelm was not entirely successful, the evidence did not support a finding that they acted for personal interests or for the director, and Mr Cvitanovic genuinely believed that standing and discretion issues should be raised in the company's interests. Therefore they were not deprived of the usual protection from personal liability, Melhelm's costs of the appointment application were payable by the company, the liquidators' costs were costs in the liquidation, Icon Brewing was not entitled to costs, and Melhelm had to pay...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application in Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Proceeding / Following Appointment of Special Purpose Liquidators; Plaintiffs Sought Further Orders as to Funding, Costs, and Confidentiality
- Outcome
- Costs orders made; application for costs by Icon Brewing dismissed; Melhelm's application for costs orders against the second and third defendants personally failed.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Liquidation Proceedings' "liquidators' Right of Indemnity" 'personal Liability of Liquidators for Costs' 'appointment of Special Purpose Liquidators' 'confidentiality Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application in Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Proceeding / Following Appointment of Special Purpose Liquidators; Plaintiffs Sought Further Orders as to Funding, Costs, and Confidentiality
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the general purpose liquidators should pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceeding personally." "Whether the general purpose liquidators should be denied recourse to their right of indemnity from the company's assets or recoveries for costs." 'Whether the general purpose liquidators acted unreasonably in opposing the appointment of special purpose liquidators.' 'Whether Icon Brewing was entitled to a costs order despite not being found to be a creditor.']
Ratio Decidendi
The general purpose liquidators did not act unreasonably in opposing the appointment of special purpose liquidators: their opposition was vindicated as to Icon Brewing, Melhelm was not entirely successful, the evidence did not support a finding that they acted for personal interests or for the director, and Mr Cvitanovic genuinely believed that standing and discretion issues should be raised in the company's interests. Therefore they were not deprived of the usual protection from personal liability, Melhelm's costs of the appointment application were payable by the company, the liquidators' costs were costs in the liquidation, Icon Brewing was not entitled to costs, and Melhelm had to pay...
Court Disposition
Costs orders made; application for costs by Icon Brewing dismissed; Melhelm's application for costs orders against the second and third defendants personally failed.
Orders
- ["The first defendant pay the first plaintiff's costs of the application for appointment of special purpose liquidators." "The second plaintiff's application for costs be dismissed." "The second and third defendants' costs of the application for appointment of special purpose liquidators be costs in the liquidation...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment