Harasty v The Owners- Strata Plan No.13031, No.2 [2023] NSWCATAP 280
Special circumstances justifying a costs order existed, given additional costs incurred due to the late withdrawal of serious and irrelevant allegations by Mr Harasty after a clear warning, and the relative strength of the Owners' case exceeded that of Mr Harasty.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs Respondent to pay 50% of Costs Applicant's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs of Appeal' 'special Circumstances for Costs' 'strata Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special circumstances exist to justify a costs order under section 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) in the context of the appeal' 'Appropriate proportion of costs payable by the Costs Respondent']
Ratio Decidendi
Special circumstances justifying a costs order existed, given additional costs incurred due to the late withdrawal of serious and irrelevant allegations by Mr Harasty after a clear warning, and the relative strength of the Owners' case exceeded that of Mr Harasty.
Court Disposition
Costs Respondent to pay 50% of Costs Applicant's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ['A hearing on costs is dispensed with in accordance with section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.' "The Costs Respondent is to pay 50% of the Costs Applicant's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation (as defined in section 3A of the Legal...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment