Douglas v Kik; Douglas v Kekatos [2021] NSWSC 345
Because the proceedings were dismissed by consent with each party to bear his, her or its own costs, and the parties informed the Court that there was no desire to alter the costs orders already made, Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 was vacated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs / Application Concerning Costs Orders After Consent Dismissal of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 vacated.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Orders' 'cross Vesting' 'consent Dismissal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs / Application Concerning Costs Orders After Consent Dismissal of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 should be vacated after the proceedings were dismissed by consent and the parties did not seek alteration of existing costs orders.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the proceedings were dismissed by consent with each party to bear his, her or its own costs, and the parties informed the Court that there was no desire to alter the costs orders already made, Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 was vacated.
Court Disposition
Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 vacated.
Orders
- ['The Court orders that Order 5 of the Orders issued on 3 December 2020 be vacated.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment