De Costi Seafoods (Franchises) Pty Limited and Anor v Wachtenheim and Anor (No 6) [2016] NSWDC 378
Mr Newell and Mr Muriniti failed to displace the statutory presumption under s 349 Legal Profession Act 2004 that services in the action against Mrs Costi lacked reasonable prospects of success, and there was evidence of serious misconduct, serious neglect, and incompetence under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005, causing a significant proportion of the applicants' costs; therefore, they must indemnify the applicants for 50% of their costs payable up to the conclusion of trial.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant/applicant: De Costi Seafoods (Franchises) Pty Limited; Second Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant/applicant: De Costi Seafoods (Holdings) Pty Limited; First Defendant/first Cross Claimant: Serge Wachtenheim; Second Defendant/second Cross Claimant: Deist Safety Equipment Australia Pty Ltd; Second Cross Defendant/applicant: Frank Theodore; Fourth Cross Defendant/applicant: George Costi; Seventh Cross Defendant/applicant: Androulla (Andrea) Costi; First Respondent to Amended Notice of Motion: Robert Newell; Second Respondent to Amended Notice of Motion: Leonardo Muriniti
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Application After Trial
- Outcome
- Practitioners ordered to indemnify applicants for 50% of their costs up to close of trial; costs of application and interest reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders Against Practitioners, Reasonable Prospects of Success, Serious Neglect/incompetence/misconduct, Liability of Practitioners for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
De Costi Seafoods (Franchises) Pty Limited
First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant/applicant
De Costi Seafoods (Holdings) Pty Limited
Second Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant/applicant
Serge Wachtenheim
First Defendant/first Cross Claimant
Deist Safety Equipment Australia Pty Ltd
Second Defendant/second Cross Claimant
Frank Theodore
Second Cross Defendant/applicant
George Costi
Fourth Cross Defendant/applicant
Androulla (Andrea) Costi
Seventh Cross Defendant/applicant
Robert Newell
First Respondent to Amended Notice of Motion
Leonardo Muriniti
Second Respondent to Amended Notice of Motion
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Application After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal services were provided without reasonable prospects of success (re Mrs Costi)
- 2 Whether serious neglect, serious incompetence, or serious misconduct by practitioners caused wasted costs
- 3 Whether the form and scope of costs orders sought are appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Newell and Mr Muriniti failed to displace the statutory presumption under s 349 Legal Profession Act 2004 that services in the action against Mrs Costi lacked reasonable prospects of success, and there was evidence of serious misconduct, serious neglect, and incompetence under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005, causing a significant proportion of the applicants' costs; therefore, they must indemnify the applicants for 50% of their costs payable up to the conclusion of trial.
Court Disposition
Practitioners ordered to indemnify applicants for 50% of their costs up to close of trial; costs of application and interest reserved.
Orders
- Order Robert Newell and Leonardo Muriniti to indemnify the applicants against 50% of their costs payable in the proceedings up to the conclusion of the trial on 11 October 2012.
- Reserve the questions of costs of the application and interest for further submissions on a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment