Rydzewski v Rydzewski (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1074
A beneficiary who brings proceedings on behalf of a deceased estate for its benefit, in circumstances where the administrator would not otherwise have done so, may recover out of the estate the difference between ordinary and indemnity costs, provided those costs were properly and reasonably incurred. The assessment of reasonableness is a matter for a costs assessor, and the onus is on the estate/administrator to demonstrate any unreasonableness in the costs claimed.
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: Stanislaus Rydzewski; Fifth Cross Defendant: Daniel McKinnon as the administrator of the Estate of the late Maria Rydzewski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity – Probate / Post Substantive Judgment – Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for payment of difference between ordinary and indemnity costs out of estate allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Payable Out of Estate, Indemnity and Ordinary Basis Costs, Quantification of Costs, Executor/administrator Indemnity, Beneficiary Derivative Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanislaus Rydzewski
Cross Claimant
Daniel McKinnon as the administrator of the Estate of the late Maria Rydzewski
Fifth Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity – Probate / Post Substantive Judgment – Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the difference between ordinary and indemnity costs incurred by a beneficiary should be paid out of the deceased estate
- 2 Whether costs incurred by the beneficiary were proper and reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
A beneficiary who brings proceedings on behalf of a deceased estate for its benefit, in circumstances where the administrator would not otherwise have done so, may recover out of the estate the difference between ordinary and indemnity costs, provided those costs were properly and reasonably incurred. The assessment of reasonableness is a matter for a costs assessor, and the onus is on the estate/administrator to demonstrate any unreasonableness in the costs claimed.
Court Disposition
Application for payment of difference between ordinary and indemnity costs out of estate allowed
Orders
- Any difference between the Cross-claimant's ordinary and indemnity costs, as agreed or assessed, be paid out of the estate of the deceased.
- The Fifth Cross-defendant's costs of the proceedings, including costs relating to the Cross-claimant's application for costs, be paid from the estate on the indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment