Warringah Council v Edmondson & Ors; Giltinan v Edmondson & Ors [2001] NSWCA 1
The Land and Environment Court orders could not stand because s 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 did not apply, the respondents failed to establish non-compliance with s 47(1)(c) and in any event s 729 barred a challenge based on a notice requirement commenced outside 3 months, and any alleged lack of procedural fairness was a common law issue rather than a contravention of or failure to comply with the Act. Edmondson and Southwood's claims therefore failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Land and Environment Court Concerning Declarations and Orders About a Council Tender Process and Lease of Community Land / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals by Warringah Council and Robert Giltinan allowed with costs; orders of the Land and Environment Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- ['council Tenders' 'lease of Community Land' 'notice Requirements' 'meaning of Adjoining' 'procedural Requirements' 'procedural Fairness' 'time Limit Under S 729 of the Local Government Act 1993']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Land and Environment Court Concerning Declarations and Orders About a Council Tender Process and Lease of Community Land / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 applied to the tender and lease despite the exception considered by the Land and Environment Court.' 'Whether the lease was in respect of District Park as a whole or only the part of District Park leased to Giltinan for the purpose of s 47(1)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.' 'Whether the dictionary definition of "adjoining" in the Local Government Act 1993 applied to s 47(1)(c).' 'Whether any failure to give notice under s 47(1)(c) was protected by s 729 of the Local Government Act 1993 because proceedings were not commenced within 3 months.' 'Whether an alleged failure to afford procedural fairness in the tender process was a contravention of or failure to comply with the Local Government Act 1993.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Land and Environment Court orders could not stand because s 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 did not apply, the respondents failed to establish non-compliance with s 47(1)(c) and in any event s 729 barred a challenge based on a notice requirement commenced outside 3 months, and any alleged lack of procedural fairness was a common law issue rather than a contravention of or failure to comply with the Act. Edmondson and Southwood's claims therefore failed.
Court Disposition
Appeals by Warringah Council and Robert Giltinan allowed with costs; orders of the Land and Environment Court set aside.
Orders
- ['Appeals by the Council and Giltinan allowed with costs.' 'Orders made by the Land and Environment Court set aside.' "Edmondson and Southwood's proceeding in the Land and Environment Court should have been dismissed with costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment