Wheeley v The Australian Electoral Commissioner [2005] FCA 473

Wheeley v The Australian Electoral Commissioner [2005] FCA 473

The petition was dismissed because it sought relief voiding elections beyond the election for the Division of Moreton, which was outside the Court of Disputed Returns' jurisdiction on this petition, and because it did not state essential facts or sufficient particulars from which invalidity of the relevant election could be concluded, so ss 355(a), 355(aa) and 358 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 barred proceedings on it.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Election Petition in the Federal Court of Australia Sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns / Hearing of Petition Remitted From the High Court of Australia for Trial
Outcome
Petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
['court of Disputed Returns Jurisdiction' 'commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Petition Requirements' 'compulsory Preferential Voting' 'validity of Election or Return']
['electoral Law' 'constitutional Law' 'federal Court Procedure'] ['court of Disputed Returns Jurisdiction' 'commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Petition Requirements' 'compulsory Preferential Voting' 'validity of Election or Return']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Election Petition in the Federal Court of Australia Sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns / Hearing of Petition Remitted From the High Court of Australia for Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court of Disputed Returns had jurisdiction to grant relief voiding elections beyond the election for the Division in which the petitioner was enrolled to vote.' 'Whether the petition complied with s 355(a) and s 355(aa) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 by setting out facts and particulars sufficient to justify invalidating an election or return.' 'Whether s 358 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 barred proceedings on the petition.']

Ratio Decidendi

The petition was dismissed because it sought relief voiding elections beyond the election for the Division of Moreton, which was outside the Court of Disputed Returns' jurisdiction on this petition, and because it did not state essential facts or sufficient particulars from which invalidity of the relevant election could be concluded, so ss 355(a), 355(aa) and 358 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 barred proceedings on it.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The petition be dismissed.' 'The petitioner pay the costs of the first, second and fifth respondents.']