Kardy J. v The Chase Manhattan Bank Australia Ltd [1995] FCA 194

Kardy J. v The Chase Manhattan Bank Australia Ltd [1995] FCA 194

The debtor admitted the indebtedness, had not sought to set aside the judgment debt, and failed to establish that any vague alleged arrangement concerning sale of his house provided a ground to refuse relief. The Court was satisfied that the debtor committed the act of bankruptcy alleged and that the matters required by subsection 52 (1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 were proved, so a sequestration order should be made.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition in Bankruptcy / Hearing of Creditor's Petition for a Sequestration Order
Outcome
Sequestration order made against the estate of the debtor.
Legal Topics
["creditor's Petition" 'bankruptcy Notice' 'act of Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Order' 'judgment Debt' 'mortgagee Power of Sale']
['bankruptcy and Insolvency'] ["creditor's Petition" 'bankruptcy Notice' 'act of Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Order' 'judgment Debt' 'mortgagee Power of Sale']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition in Bankruptcy / Hearing of Creditor's Petition for a Sequestration Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the debtor's alleged non-service of documents giving rise to the judgment debt justified refusing a sequestration order." "Whether an alleged arrangement concerning sale of the debtor's house justified refusing a sequestration order." 'Whether the debtor committed the act of bankruptcy alleged in the petition and whether the matters required by subsection 52 (1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 were proved.']

Ratio Decidendi

The debtor admitted the indebtedness, had not sought to set aside the judgment debt, and failed to establish that any vague alleged arrangement concerning sale of his house provided a ground to refuse relief. The Court was satisfied that the debtor committed the act of bankruptcy alleged and that the matters required by subsection 52 (1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 were proved, so a sequestration order should be made.

Court Disposition

Sequestration order made against the estate of the debtor.

Orders

  • ['A sequestration order is made against the estate of the debtor.' "The petitioning creditor's costs, including any reserved costs, are to be taxed and paid in accordance with the Act." 'A draft of the order is to be delivered to the Registrar within 7 days in accordance with sub-r 124 (2) of the Bankruptcy Rules.']