Re Jensen, Niel Henrik Ex Parte Jensen, Robin Rosemary [1982] FCA 295
A Family Court order described as 'as and by way of property settlement' but not relating to any particular property is not a property order under s.79 of the Family Law Act, and is likely a maintenance order, which is not a final order for bankruptcy purposes; thus, the creditor's petition must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Debtor: Niel Henrik Jensen; Petitioning Creditor: Robin Rosemary Jensen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Final Judgment (dismissal of Petition)
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Creditor's Petition, Bankruptcy Notice, Family Court Order, Property Settlement, Maintenance Order, Final Judgment, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Niel Henrik Jensen
Debtor
Robin Rosemary Jensen
Petitioning Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Judgment (dismissal of Petition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Family Court consent order described as a property settlement is a final judgment or final order for bankruptcy purposes
- 2 Whether a bankruptcy petition founded on debt under a Family Court Order is a 'matrimonial cause'
- 3 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to go behind a Family Court order
Ratio Decidendi
A Family Court order described as 'as and by way of property settlement' but not relating to any particular property is not a property order under s.79 of the Family Law Act, and is likely a maintenance order, which is not a final order for bankruptcy purposes; thus, the creditor's petition must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- The sequestration petition is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment