R v Klein (No.4) [2008] NSWSC 340

R v Klein (No.4) [2008] NSWSC 340

The evidence of the intercepted phone calls had substantial probative value as to the credibility of the witness, and any risk of unfair prejudice could be addressed by a clear jury direction that no inference should be drawn against the accused from his brother's actions, leading to the objection being overruled and the evidence admitted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Evidentiary Objection at Trial
Outcome
Objection overruled.
Legal Topics
['cross Examination' 'credibility of Witness' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'unfair Prejudice']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['cross Examination' 'credibility of Witness' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'unfair Prejudice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Evidentiary Objection at Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Crown may cross-examine its own witness (Jacob Compagnon) regarding intercepted telephone calls under s 38 of the Evidence Act' 'Whether the evidence has substantial probative value under s 103(1) and/or s 103(2)(a) of the Evidence Act' 'Whether the evidence should be excluded under s 137 of the Evidence Act due to potential unfair prejudice']

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of the intercepted phone calls had substantial probative value as to the credibility of the witness, and any risk of unfair prejudice could be addressed by a clear jury direction that no inference should be drawn against the accused from his brother's actions, leading to the objection being overruled and the evidence admitted.

Court Disposition

Objection overruled.

Orders

  • ['Objection by accused to cross-examination of witness regarding intercepted phone calls is overruled.' 'Evidence to be admitted with agreed redactions and an appropriate jury direction on its limited use.']