Lamru Pty Limited v Kation Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 195

Lamru Pty Limited v Kation Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 195

Further cross-examination was refused because the applicant had a fair opportunity to cross-examine the witness before the registrar, and to allow further cross-examination would go beyond what is reasonably necessary for the fair determination of the application for review.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Review of Registrar's Decision
Outcome
Application for further cross-examination refused
Legal Topics
['cross Examination' "review of Registrar's Decision" 'interlocutory Applications']
['evidence' 'civil Procedure'] ['cross Examination' "review of Registrar's Decision" 'interlocutory Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Review of Registrar's Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether further cross-examination of a witness who was cross-examined before the registrar should be allowed on application for review of the registrar's decision"]

Ratio Decidendi

Further cross-examination was refused because the applicant had a fair opportunity to cross-examine the witness before the registrar, and to allow further cross-examination would go beyond what is reasonably necessary for the fair determination of the application for review.

Court Disposition

Application for further cross-examination refused

Orders

  • ['No order or direction made requiring Mr Lamb to submit to further cross-examination on his affidavit sworn 19 June 2012']