R v Warwick (No.87) [2020] NSWSC 36

R v Warwick (No.87) [2020] NSWSC 36

The question was rejected because it fell outside the specified subject matters for which leave to further cross-examine the witness was granted. No application was made to extend the scope, and the methodology of recording in e@gle.i had no connection to the permitted topics.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Cross Examination During Trial
Outcome
Question rejected
Legal Topics
['cross Examination' 'recall of Witness' 'procedural Ruling']
['evidence' 'criminal Law'] ['cross Examination' 'recall of Witness' 'procedural Ruling']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Cross Examination During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the question asked during cross-examination of Detective Bradley fell outside the scope of leave granted for recall of witness']

Ratio Decidendi

The question was rejected because it fell outside the specified subject matters for which leave to further cross-examine the witness was granted. No application was made to extend the scope, and the methodology of recording in e@gle.i had no connection to the permitted topics.

Court Disposition

Question rejected

Orders

  • ['Question rejected']