Jin Niu Investments Pty Ltd v Wang [2019] NSWSC 1697
The proceedings are found to involve a special federal matter as they may impact property subject to bankruptcy, and special reasons exist for the Supreme Court to hear the case, considering the proceedings' advanced stage and the potential for cost and delay if transferred.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Jin Niu Investments Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Henan Jin Niu Industrial (Group) Co Limited; Third Plaintiff: Jianqiang Wang; First Defendant: Yuehin (Christine) Wang; Second Defendant: Ping Li; Third Defendant: Jin Niu Property Development Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Jin Niu Agribusiness Pty Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Australian Securities Investment Commission (as recipient of the property of NSW Land Pty Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Notice of Motion Regarding Determination of Proceedings by Supreme Court After Bankruptcy of Defendant
- Outcome
- Proceedings to be determined by Supreme Court of NSW; plaintiffs' motion costs are costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Cross Vesting, Special Federal Matter, Leave to Continue After Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jin Niu Investments Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff
Henan Jin Niu Industrial (Group) Co Limited
Second Plaintiff
Jianqiang Wang
Third Plaintiff
Yuehin (Christine) Wang
First Defendant
Ping Li
Second Defendant
Jin Niu Property Development Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Jin Niu Agribusiness Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant
Australian Securities Investment Commission (as recipient of the property of NSW Land Pty Ltd)
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Notice of Motion Regarding Determination of Proceedings by Supreme Court After Bankruptcy of Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings involve a special federal matter under s 3(1)(e) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth)
- 2 Whether there are special reasons for the Supreme Court to determine the proceedings rather than transfer to the Federal Court
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings are found to involve a special federal matter as they may impact property subject to bankruptcy, and special reasons exist for the Supreme Court to hear the case, considering the proceedings' advanced stage and the potential for cost and delay if transferred.
Court Disposition
Proceedings to be determined by Supreme Court of NSW; plaintiffs' motion costs are costs in the cause.
Orders
- Order pursuant to s 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) that the proceedings be determined by this Court.
- The costs of the plaintiffs' motion are costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment