Poole v Aspect One Pty Limited atf Aspect Homes Unit Trust No 1 [2019] NSWSC 1790
It was not established that it would be in the interests of justice to transfer proceedings to the Supreme Court of Queensland, as the connecting factors did not weigh sufficiently against the plaintiff’s significant costs already incurred in New South Wales and the issues in dispute are limited (amounts owing/guarantees).
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Aspect One Pty Limited ACN 097 856 356 as trustee for Aspect Homes Unit Trust No 1; First Defendant: Fortunam Stafford Pty Ltd ACN 610 869 157 as trustee for Safford Unit Trust; Second Defendant: Sassari Terraces Pty Ltd ACN 606 319 377 as trustee for Sassari Unit Trust; Third Defendant: Fortunam Malvern Pty Ltd ACN 609 186 825 as trustee for Malvern Unit Trust; Fourth Defendant: Fortunam Blackburn Pty Ltd ACN 608 219 021 as trustee for Blackburn Unit Trust; Fifth Defendant/applicant: Marie-Therese Poole; Sixth Defendant: Michelle Lee-Anne Coleman
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Motion / Interlocutory Application Transfer of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. The fifth defendant must pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- Cross Vesting, Transfer of Proceedings, Interests of Justice, Debt Recovery, Enforcement of Guarantee, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aspect One Pty Limited ACN 097 856 356 as trustee for Aspect Homes Unit Trust No 1
Plaintiff/respondent
Fortunam Stafford Pty Ltd ACN 610 869 157 as trustee for Safford Unit Trust
First Defendant
Sassari Terraces Pty Ltd ACN 606 319 377 as trustee for Sassari Unit Trust
Second Defendant
Fortunam Malvern Pty Ltd ACN 609 186 825 as trustee for Malvern Unit Trust
Third Defendant
Fortunam Blackburn Pty Ltd ACN 608 219 021 as trustee for Blackburn Unit Trust
Fourth Defendant
Marie-Therese Poole
Fifth Defendant/applicant
Michelle Lee-Anne Coleman
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural Motion / Interlocutory Application Transfer of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland under s 5 of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) in the interests of justice
- 2 Whether it is appropriate to order costs against the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
It was not established that it would be in the interests of justice to transfer proceedings to the Supreme Court of Queensland, as the connecting factors did not weigh sufficiently against the plaintiff’s significant costs already incurred in New South Wales and the issues in dispute are limited (amounts owing/guarantees).
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. The fifth defendant must pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The fifth defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment