Collier & Anor v Chief Executive Officer and Director-General of the Department of Child Safety Queensland & Anor [2009] NSWSC 229
The NSW Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to transfer proceedings from the Queensland Court of Appeal under s 5(2)(b) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act; as only the Supreme Court of Queensland can exercise that power, the application is dismissed.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Robert John Collier; Second Plaintiff: Marion Louise Collier; First Defendant: Chief Executive Officer and Director-General of the Department of Child Safety Queensland; Second Defendant: Damien Carter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment on Summons to Transfer Proceedings to NSW Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Cross Vesting of Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert John Collier
First Plaintiff
Marion Louise Collier
Second Plaintiff
Chief Executive Officer and Director-General of the Department of Child Safety Queensland
First Defendant
Damien Carter
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Summons to Transfer Proceedings to NSW Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the NSW Supreme Court has jurisdiction under s 5(2)(b) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) to transfer proceedings from the Queensland Court of Appeal to itself
- 2 Whether s 117 of the Constitution provides jurisdiction to the NSW Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
The NSW Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to transfer proceedings from the Queensland Court of Appeal under s 5(2)(b) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act; as only the Supreme Court of Queensland can exercise that power, the application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to pay First Defendant's costs of the proceedings on the party/party basis.
- Plaintiffs to pay Second Defendant's costs of the proceedings on the indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment