R v Said [2018] NSWDC 430

R v Said [2018] NSWDC 430

The offence was towards the mid-range of objective seriousness because it involved 100 cannabis plants, more than double the commercial quantity, in a sophisticated indoor hydroponic operation with substantial street value, but the offender was a young resident gardener rather than a principal, had pleaded early, had no proved prior history, showed remorse, had reasonable rehabilitation prospects, and had circumstances making custody more onerous; a term of imprisonment with a reduced non-parole period for special circumstances was therefore appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
Outcome
The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 14 months; special circumstances were found.
Legal Topics
['cultivate Prohibited Plant' 'cannabis' 'enhanced Indoor Means' 'special Circumstances' 'full Time Imprisonment' 'early Guilty Plea']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing / Sentence

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for cultivating cannabis by enhanced indoor means in a quantity not less than the commercial quantity under s 23(2)(a) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.' 'Whether special circumstances should be found.' 'Whether mitigating factors including youth, lack of prior criminal history, limited family support, mental health evidence, remorse, role as resident gardener, and onerous custody should affect sentence.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offence was towards the mid-range of objective seriousness because it involved 100 cannabis plants, more than double the commercial quantity, in a sophisticated indoor hydroponic operation with substantial street value, but the offender was a young resident gardener rather than a principal, had pleaded early, had no proved prior history, showed remorse, had reasonable rehabilitation prospects, and had circumstances making custody more onerous; a term of imprisonment with a reduced non-parole period for special circumstances was therefore appropriate.

Court Disposition

The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 14 months; special circumstances were found.

Orders

  • ['The offender is convicted of the offence.' 'A sentence of imprisonment of 2 years, 3 months is imposed, to commence on 11 April 2018 and expire on 10 July 2020.' 'A non-parole period of 14 months is imposed, expiring on 10 June 2019; the offender is eligible for release to parole on that date.' 'Special...