R v Said [2018] NSWDC 430
The offence was towards the mid-range of objective seriousness because it involved 100 cannabis plants, more than double the commercial quantity, in a sophisticated indoor hydroponic operation with substantial street value, but the offender was a young resident gardener rather than a principal, had pleaded early, had no proved prior history, showed remorse, had reasonable rehabilitation prospects, and had circumstances making custody more onerous; a term of imprisonment with a reduced non-parole period for special circumstances was therefore appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 14 months; special circumstances were found.
- Legal Topics
- ['cultivate Prohibited Plant' 'cannabis' 'enhanced Indoor Means' 'special Circumstances' 'full Time Imprisonment' 'early Guilty Plea']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for cultivating cannabis by enhanced indoor means in a quantity not less than the commercial quantity under s 23(2)(a) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.' 'Whether special circumstances should be found.' 'Whether mitigating factors including youth, lack of prior criminal history, limited family support, mental health evidence, remorse, role as resident gardener, and onerous custody should affect sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was towards the mid-range of objective seriousness because it involved 100 cannabis plants, more than double the commercial quantity, in a sophisticated indoor hydroponic operation with substantial street value, but the offender was a young resident gardener rather than a principal, had pleaded early, had no proved prior history, showed remorse, had reasonable rehabilitation prospects, and had circumstances making custody more onerous; a term of imprisonment with a reduced non-parole period for special circumstances was therefore appropriate.
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 14 months; special circumstances were found.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of the offence.' 'A sentence of imprisonment of 2 years, 3 months is imposed, to commence on 11 April 2018 and expire on 10 July 2020.' 'A non-parole period of 14 months is imposed, expiring on 10 June 2019; the offender is eligible for release to parole on that date.' 'Special...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment