R v Xie (No 19) [2015] NSWSC 2130
The proposed evidence from Mr Goetz regarding the similarity of proportions of alleles between DNA profiles, though possibly probative, is inadmissible because it carries a risk of unfair prejudice, involves subjective interpretation beyond mere objective fact, and does not satisfy the admissibility requirements for opinion evidence under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Accused: Lian Bin (Robert) Xie
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Evidence Admissibility
- Outcome
- Evidence inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- DNA Evidence, Admissibility of Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Lian Bin (Robert) Xie
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Evidence Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed DNA expert evidence regarding similarity in proportions of alleles between crime scene samples and sample from accused's garage is admissible under s 79 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the evidence is opinion or objective fact
- 3 Risk of unfair prejudice to accused by admitting such evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed evidence from Mr Goetz regarding the similarity of proportions of alleles between DNA profiles, though possibly probative, is inadmissible because it carries a risk of unfair prejudice, involves subjective interpretation beyond mere objective fact, and does not satisfy the admissibility requirements for opinion evidence under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Evidence inadmissible
Orders
- Further evidence the Crown proposes to call from Mr Goetz is disallowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment