Radferry Pty Ltd & Anor v Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 1689
The correct measure of damages for deceit and under the Trade Practices Act is the difference between the price paid for the business and its real value at the date of acquisition (as reflected by later trading history), and for breach of contract, the difference between the value of the business as warranted and its actual value. Additional claims for lost opportunities or further profits are not recoverable where such losses are already reflected in the primary calculation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Cross-appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['damages' 'deceit' 'breach of Contract' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'quantification of Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the correct measure of damages for deceit, breach of contract, and misleading and deceptive conduct under ss 82 and 87 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)?' 'How should the loss suffered by the purchaser be quantified in light of misleading representations and the business’ actual performance?' 'Are additional losses or opportunity losses recoverable beyond the primary measure of damages?']
Ratio Decidendi
The correct measure of damages for deceit and under the Trade Practices Act is the difference between the price paid for the business and its real value at the date of acquisition (as reflected by later trading history), and for breach of contract, the difference between the value of the business as warranted and its actual value. Additional claims for lost opportunities or further profits are not recoverable where such losses are already reflected in the primary calculation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Cross-appeal allowed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The cross-appeal is allowed.' 'Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the orders below are set aside and substituted as follows: (i) The respondents are to pay the applicant the sum of $90,000 and interest thereon to 27 April 1998 in the amount of $5653; (ii) The first respondent is to pay to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment