Alegounarias v Williams; Barnes v Williams; [2012] NSWLEC 1052
The Court was satisfied, after inspection and by reference to the experts' agreement, that there was a nexus between the Camphor Laurel and the damaged garage. Because rectifying the damage and preventing future damage would require severing major structural roots, rendering the tree unstable and a risk to people and property, the proposed consent orders for removal were appropriate and within jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Application Under S7 Part 2 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment; Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Application to remove tree upheld; consent orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['damage to Property Caused by Tree Roots' 'removal of Tree' 'consent Orders' 'jurisdiction Under S 10(2) of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Application Under S7 Part 2 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment; Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court had jurisdiction under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 to make orders for removal of the tree.' "Whether the mature Camphor Laurel caused damage to the applicants' property and whether removal of the tree and stump was appropriate."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, after inspection and by reference to the experts' agreement, that there was a nexus between the Camphor Laurel and the damaged garage. Because rectifying the damage and preventing future damage would require severing major structural roots, rendering the tree unstable and a risk to people and property, the proposed consent orders for removal were appropriate and within jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application to remove tree upheld; consent orders made.
Orders
- ['The application to remove the tree is upheld.' 'Within 90 days of the date of these orders, the applicants in matters 21041 and 21042 of 2011 are to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist with membership of an arboricultural industry association and appropriate levels and types of insurance to remove the tree,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment