R v Nguyen [2021] NSWDC 295
The accused established, on the balance of probabilities, the statutory defence under s 193C(4) of the Crimes Act 1900: that he had no reasonable grounds for suspecting the $40,000 was substantially the proceeds of crime, given the court accepted the evidence of his father and Ms Tran as to the money's provenance, and was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt to the contrary. Accordingly, the accused must be found not guilty.
- Parties
- Crown: Director of Public Prosecutions; Offender: Richard Nguyen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial Verdict
- Outcome
- Not Guilty
- Legal Topics
- Dealing With Property, Proceeds of Crime, Statutory Defence Under Crimes Act 1900 S 193 C(4), Assessment of Credibility, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Crown
Richard Nguyen
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused dealt with property reasonably suspected to be proceeds of crime under s 193C(2) of the Crimes Act 1900
- 2 Whether the statutory defence under s 193C(4) of the Crimes Act 1900 was established on the balance of probabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The accused established, on the balance of probabilities, the statutory defence under s 193C(4) of the Crimes Act 1900: that he had no reasonable grounds for suspecting the $40,000 was substantially the proceeds of crime, given the court accepted the evidence of his father and Ms Tran as to the money's provenance, and was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt to the contrary. Accordingly, the accused must be found not guilty.
Court Disposition
Not Guilty
Orders
- Verdict of not guilty entered on the Indictment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment