Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75

Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75

The Goulds were entitled to recover damages for personal loss suffered as a direct consequence of fraudulent misrepresentation, including transferred property and obligations under guarantees, since their right to recover from Gould Holdings was deemed valueless. The Bullock order for costs was appropriate as the conduct of the unsuccessful defendants justified it.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of Supreme Court of Queensland
Outcome
Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['deceit' 'fraudulent Misrepresentation' 'damages' 'measure of Damages' 'corporate Personality' 'costs (bullock Order)']
['tort Law' 'contract Law' 'company Law'] ['deceit' 'fraudulent Misrepresentation' 'damages' 'measure of Damages' 'corporate Personality' 'costs (bullock Order)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Cross Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of Supreme Court of Queensland

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Goulds were induced by fraudulent misrepresentation to enter the transactions' 'Appropriate measure and quantum of damages for deceit where purchaser is a company' 'Entitlement to consequential losses beyond difference in value and price' 'Appropriateness of Bullock order for costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The Goulds were entitled to recover damages for personal loss suffered as a direct consequence of fraudulent misrepresentation, including transferred property and obligations under guarantees, since their right to recover from Gould Holdings was deemed valueless. The Bullock order for costs was appropriate as the conduct of the unsuccessful defendants justified it.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Judgment of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland set aside; appeal to that Court dismissed with costs' 'Bullock order restored' 'Damages in favour of Goulds set at $1,427,500' 'Interest at 12% per annum on judgment debt for 18 September 1981 to 6 November 1984' 'Amendment under slip rule to formal...