McMahon, John Keith EX PARTE News Ltd (T/as Newsnet) [1997] FCA 8
Given the inadequacy of concrete evidence concerning provision of funds for the deed of arrangement, unresolved issues with excluded creditors, lack of clarity on taxation liabilities, and public interest concerns including the debtor's directorships, the Court finds the evidence unconvincing and dismisses the application for annulment; the sequestration order stands.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Annulment of Sequestration Order
- Outcome
- Application for annulment dismissed; sequestration order remains.
- Legal Topics
- ['deed of Arrangement' 'sequestration Order' 'annulment of Bankruptcy' "creditors' Meeting"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Annulment of Sequestration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sequestration order should be annulled under Bankruptcy Act 1966' 'Whether the deed of arrangement proposed by the debtor should be accepted in lieu of bankruptcy']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the inadequacy of concrete evidence concerning provision of funds for the deed of arrangement, unresolved issues with excluded creditors, lack of clarity on taxation liabilities, and public interest concerns including the debtor's directorships, the Court finds the evidence unconvincing and dismisses the application for annulment; the sequestration order stands.
Court Disposition
Application for annulment dismissed; sequestration order remains.
Orders
- ['Order that the motion brought by notice of motion filed by the Bankrupt on 6 January 1997 be dismissed.' "Order that the petitioning creditor's costs of its application filed on 13 May 1996 and decided by Moore J on 29 November 1996, of its application decided by Lindgren J on 20 December 1996, and of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment