Re Hamilton, R.I. v. Ex parte Figueroa, A. [1985] FCA 618
The debtor's statement of affairs stated that his half interest in the Walton land was worth nil, but the evidence showed the land was worth at least $120,000 and that the debtor's half interest was recognised by the company holding legal title. The nil valuation was therefore an incorrect and material particular. Given the value of the omitted asset in the context of the debtor's affairs, the perpetuation of the valuation at the creditors' meeting, and additional matters suggesting the debtor's affairs required close investigation, it was proper to exercise the discretion to declare the deed of composition void. The sequestration petition was adjourned on undertakings to allow the debtor...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application to Set Aside Deed of Composition and Creditor's Petition for Sequestration / Judgment on Application Under S. 222(4) and Adjournment of Sequestration Petition
- Outcome
- Deed of composition declared void; debtor ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the application; sequestration petition adjourned on undertakings, with costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['deed of Composition' 'statement of Affairs' 'incorrect and Material Particular' 'registrar or Court Discretion Under Bankruptcy Act 1966' 'sequestration Petition' 'part X Administration' 'priority Wages' 'preference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application to Set Aside Deed of Composition and Creditor's Petition for Sequestration / Judgment on Application Under S. 222(4) and Adjournment of Sequestration Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the debtor's deed of composition should be declared void under s. 222(4)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 because the statement of affairs omitted or included an incorrect and material particular." "Whether valuing the debtor's half interest in land at Walton as nil was an incorrect and material particular." 'Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to set aside the deed of composition.' 'Whether the sequestration petition should proceed immediately or be adjourned to allow the debtor an opportunity to propose another composition.']
Ratio Decidendi
The debtor's statement of affairs stated that his half interest in the Walton land was worth nil, but the evidence showed the land was worth at least $120,000 and that the debtor's half interest was recognised by the company holding legal title. The nil valuation was therefore an incorrect and material particular. Given the value of the omitted asset in the context of the debtor's affairs, the perpetuation of the valuation at the creditors' meeting, and additional matters suggesting the debtor's affairs required close investigation, it was proper to exercise the discretion to declare the deed of composition void. The sequestration petition was adjourned on undertakings to allow the debtor...
Court Disposition
Deed of composition declared void; debtor ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the application; sequestration petition adjourned on undertakings, with costs reserved.
Orders
- ['In matter W 187/85, the deed of composition referred to in the application was declared void.' "The respondent to the application was ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the application." 'In matter P 571 of 1985, upon the debtor giving undertakings, the petition was stood over to 7 February 1986 at 9.30 a.m.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment