Grant v John Grant and Sons Pty Ltd [1954] HCA 23
The general words of the deed of release are, both at law and in equity, limited to matters in the contemplation of the parties at the time it was executed, as ascertained by reference to the recitals, the terms of the instrument, and the surrounding circumstances, including knowledge and intention. Claims not in dispute or not known to the releasor at the time are not released unless the release unambiguously so provides. On the facts as pleaded, the plaintiff's claims were not released, and equitable considerations confirmed this outcome.
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: Grand; Respondent; Plaintiff: John Grant & Sons Proprietary Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal From Judgment on Demurrers to Replications / High Court of Australia (after Full Court, Supreme Court of New South Wales)
- Outcome
- First replication (cross-appeal) allowed; order for plaintiff. Second replication (appeal) allowed; order for defendant. Third replication (appeal) dismissed; order for plaintiff. Appellant to pay costs of appeal and cross-appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Release, Construction of Releases, Limitation of General Words, Equitable Restraint on Release
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grand
Appellant; Defendant
John Grant & Sons Proprietary Limited
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal From Judgment on Demurrers to Replications / High Court of Australia (after Full Court, Supreme Court of New South Wales)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the general words in a deed of release should be limited to matters contemplated or in dispute between the parties at the time of execution
- 2 Whether equitable principles allow a party to avoid the effect of a release on claims not known or not intended to be released
Ratio Decidendi
The general words of the deed of release are, both at law and in equity, limited to matters in the contemplation of the parties at the time it was executed, as ascertained by reference to the recitals, the terms of the instrument, and the surrounding circumstances, including knowledge and intention. Claims not in dispute or not known to the releasor at the time are not released unless the release unambiguously so provides. On the facts as pleaded, the plaintiff's claims were not released, and equitable considerations confirmed this outcome.
Court Disposition
First replication (cross-appeal) allowed; order for plaintiff. Second replication (appeal) allowed; order for defendant. Third replication (appeal) dismissed; order for plaintiff. Appellant to pay costs of appeal and cross-appeal.
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiff on first replication instead of for defendant.
- Judgment for defendant on second replication instead of for plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment