Commissioner of Taxation v Rozman (No 2) [2010] FCA 387
Section 109C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) encompasses payments by direction from a private company to a shareholder, and this interpretation is not prevented or modified by the operation of s 109T (payments through interposed entities) or s 109Y (distributable surplus limits).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment on Reconsideration of Reasons and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal allowed in part; decision of the Tribunal set aside and remitted for reconsideration; applicant ordered to pay respondent's costs
- Legal Topics
- ['deemed Dividend' 's 109 C Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (cth)' 's 109 T Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (cth)' 'division 7 A' 'payment by Direction' 'interposed Entities' 'distributable Surplus']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment on Reconsideration of Reasons and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does s 109T Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) prevent s 109C from encompassing payments by direction?' 'Whether the construction of s 109C includes payments by direction, and the interaction with s 109T and s 109Y.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 109C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) encompasses payments by direction from a private company to a shareholder, and this interpretation is not prevented or modified by the operation of s 109T (payments through interposed entities) or s 109Y (distributable surplus limits).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal allowed in part; decision of the Tribunal set aside and remitted for reconsideration; applicant ordered to pay respondent's costs
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'Cross-appeal allowed in part.' 'Set aside the decision made by the Tribunal in proceedings No 1218 of 2007 and remit the matter to the Tribunal to be dealt with conformably with the reasons of this Court.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal and cross-appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment