Cameron v Lamonde [2000] NSWSC 566

Cameron v Lamonde [2000] NSWSC 566

The Belrose property was owned by the plaintiff before the de facto relationship began, the relationship was relatively short, and the plaintiff was the principal breadwinner and bore the major household and property expenses. The defendant nevertheless made significant direct financial contributions, including at least $15,000 towards the kitchen, direct non-financial contributions to the gardens, and homemaker and limited parental contributions. In all the circumstances it was appropriate that, in addition to the agreed amount of $50,833.79, the plaintiff pay the defendant a further $50,000, upon which the defendant must transfer her interest in the Belrose property to the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984 for Adjustment of Interests in Property / Judgment After Hearing of the Plaintiff's Claim and the Defendant's Cross Claim
Outcome
Orders made requiring the defendant to transfer her interest in the Belrose property to the plaintiff upon payment by the plaintiff of the agreed amount and an additional $50,000; no order as to costs unless a party sought argument on costs within seven days.
Legal Topics
['de Facto Relationship' 'adjustment of Property Interests' 'financial and Non Financial Contributions' 'homemaker Contributions' 'joint Tenancy' 'loan Between De Facto Partners']
['family Law' 'property Law' 'equity'] ['de Facto Relationship' 'adjustment of Property Interests' 'financial and Non Financial Contributions' 'homemaker Contributions' 'joint Tenancy' 'loan Between De Facto Partners']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Proceedings Under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984 for Adjustment of Interests in Property / Judgment After Hearing of the Plaintiff's Claim and the Defendant's Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What adjustment of the parties' interests in the Belrose property should be made under section 20 of the De Facto Relationships Act 1984." 'What amount, if any, the plaintiff should pay the defendant in return for transfer of her interest in the Belrose property.' "How the parties' financial contributions, non-financial contributions, homemaker contributions, the loan, and the short duration of the relationship should affect the adjustment."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Belrose property was owned by the plaintiff before the de facto relationship began, the relationship was relatively short, and the plaintiff was the principal breadwinner and bore the major household and property expenses. The defendant nevertheless made significant direct financial contributions, including at least $15,000 towards the kitchen, direct non-financial contributions to the gardens, and homemaker and limited parental contributions. In all the circumstances it was appropriate that, in addition to the agreed amount of $50,833.79, the plaintiff pay the defendant a further $50,000, upon which the defendant must transfer her interest in the Belrose property to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Orders made requiring the defendant to transfer her interest in the Belrose property to the plaintiff upon payment by the plaintiff of the agreed amount and an additional $50,000; no order as to costs unless a party sought argument on costs within seven days.

Orders

  • ['Order as in paragraph 1 of the Order by Consent dated 3 May 2000, signed by the parties and their solicitors, initialled by the Master and filed in Court.' 'Notation upon the Order by Consent noted.' 'The defendant within 14 days is to transfer to the plaintiff her interest in the property at 8 Knightsbridge...