Stelzer v McDonald [1999] NSWSC 602
The de facto relationship commenced in about April 1994, not August 1989, because until then the parties maintained significant separateness, including separate premises and finances, despite an intimate and close relationship. Although the relationship was less than two years, both parties made substantial contributions, permitting adjustment under s 17(2)(b)(i). Considering the whole relationship realistically, including financial contributions, homemaker contributions, the plaintiff's greater cash contribution to the development, the defendant's substantial building and project contributions, the short duration of the de facto relationship, and the plaintiff's occupation of 117 Holt...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (nsw) for Declaration and Adjustment of Property Interests, With Cross Claim / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Property interests adjusted; matter adjourned for short minutes and costs argument.
- Legal Topics
- ['de Facto Relationships' 'adjustment of Property Interests' 'financial and Non Financial Contributions' 'beneficial Ownership' 'section 17 Threshold Under De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (nsw) for Declaration and Adjustment of Property Interests, With Cross Claim / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties lived together in a de facto relationship for the period alleged by the plaintiff or only for a shorter period.' 'Whether the Court could make an order adjusting property interests where the de facto relationship was less than two years but substantial contributions were made.' 'What financial, non-financial and homemaker contributions should be considered in determining a just and equitable adjustment of property interests.' 'Whether the plaintiff should be declared beneficial owner of 117 Holt Road, Taren Point and how the joint account should be distributed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The de facto relationship commenced in about April 1994, not August 1989, because until then the parties maintained significant separateness, including separate premises and finances, despite an intimate and close relationship. Although the relationship was less than two years, both parties made substantial contributions, permitting adjustment under s 17(2)(b)(i). Considering the whole relationship realistically, including financial contributions, homemaker contributions, the plaintiff's greater cash contribution to the development, the defendant's substantial building and project contributions, the short duration of the de facto relationship, and the plaintiff's occupation of 117 Holt...
Court Disposition
Property interests adjusted; matter adjourned for short minutes and costs argument.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff is entitled to the beneficial interest in the property at 117 Holt Road, Taren Point.' 'The defendant is entitled to the balance of the joint account including the money already paid to him, less $25,000 to be paid to the plaintiff.' 'The matter is adjourned to enable the parties to bring in short...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment