Lazarus v Northern Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWSC 1453

Lazarus v Northern Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWSC 1453

The plaintiffs' summons was dismissed as it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. The contentions failed to identify any reviewable jurisdictional error, denial of natural justice, or unlawful use of evidence. Their arguments were either irrelevant, not connected to the legal validity of the default judgment, or already disposed of by previous appellate authority. The grounds relating to constitutional law and human rights did not give rise to actionable relief. The proceedings against the second and third plaintiffs were also unsupported.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Civil Procedure Default Judgment / Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment, Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal
Outcome
Summons dismissed. Plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
Legal Topics
['default Judgment' 'summary Dismissal' 'no Reasonable Cause of Action' 'icac Evidence' 'natural Justice']
['civil Procedure' 'judicial Review'] ['default Judgment' 'summary Dismissal' 'no Reasonable Cause of Action' 'icac Evidence' 'natural Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Civil Procedure Default Judgment / Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment, Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the summons disclosed any reasonable cause of action for judicial review of default judgment' 'Whether the plaintiffs established any jurisdictional error, denial of natural justice, or other basis for setting aside the default judgment' 'Whether evidence obtained during ICAC investigations was impermissibly used in civil proceedings']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs' summons was dismissed as it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. The contentions failed to identify any reviewable jurisdictional error, denial of natural justice, or unlawful use of evidence. Their arguments were either irrelevant, not connected to the legal validity of the default judgment, or already disposed of by previous appellate authority. The grounds relating to constitutional law and human rights did not give rise to actionable relief. The proceedings against the second and third plaintiffs were also unsupported.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed. Plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to rule 13.4(1)(b) of the UCPR the summons filed 18 January 2021 is dismissed.' 'The plaintiffs to pay the costs of the defendants as agreed or as assessed.']