HARDIVAN HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED v AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP [1995] NSWCA 191
The proper course, given the motion has been filed in the District Court, is for the District Court to hear it on its merits. The technical point as to service can be determined, if necessary, at a later stage. Therefore, the summons for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hardivan Holdings Pty Limited; Opponent: Australian and New Zealand Banking Group
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Summons for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From the District Court
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed. Leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Service of Process, Application to Set Aside Judgment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hardivan Holdings Pty Limited
Claimant
Australian and New Zealand Banking Group
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Summons for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment was validly entered due to proper service of process
- 2 Whether the application to set aside default judgment should be determined in the District Court or on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The proper course, given the motion has been filed in the District Court, is for the District Court to hear it on its merits. The technical point as to service can be determined, if necessary, at a later stage. Therefore, the summons for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed. Leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Summons dismissed.
- Claimants must pay the opponent's costs in this Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment