Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Nedlands Pty Ltd (in liq) [2000] FCA 599
The Registrar had no actual power to make the winding up order because the subject matter did not fall within the Federal Court's original jurisdiction, but the Registrar acted as an officer of the Court under a delegation scheme that was not itself unconstitutional and that made his order subject to review by a Judge. The defect related to the jurisdiction purportedly exercised, not to the constitutional status of the Registrar. The order was therefore attributable to the Federal Court as a superior court of record and was voidable, not void, and it was not liable to be quashed by certiorari in this proceeding.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Motion Concerning the Validity of a Registrar's Winding Up Order / Application to Vacate or Set Aside, Stay, Declare Invalid, or Quash by Certiorari a Winding Up Order Made on 20 September 1994
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['delegation of Powers to Registrars' 'winding Up Orders' 'void and Voidable Orders' 'certiorari' 'superior Court of Record']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion Concerning the Validity of a Registrar's Winding Up Order / Application to Vacate or Set Aside, Stay, Declare Invalid, or Quash by Certiorari a Winding Up Order Made on 20 September 1994
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a winding up order made by a Registrar under an ineffective delegation was void ab initio or merely voidable' "Whether a voidable Registrar's order could be quashed by an order in the nature of certiorari" 'Whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction in the motion to determine whether the purported order of the Court was a nullity']
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar had no actual power to make the winding up order because the subject matter did not fall within the Federal Court's original jurisdiction, but the Registrar acted as an officer of the Court under a delegation scheme that was not itself unconstitutional and that made his order subject to review by a Judge. The defect related to the jurisdiction purportedly exercised, not to the constitutional status of the Registrar. The order was therefore attributable to the Federal Court as a superior court of record and was voidable, not void, and it was not liable to be quashed by certiorari in this proceeding.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['the motion be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment