Gillespie v Gillespies Cranes Nominees Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1184
Section 236(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 does not abolish the court's power to authorise a trust law derivative action where the trustee is a company; such actions stem from the court's administrative jurisdiction over trusts, require court authorisation (upon 'special circumstances'), and may proceed subject to appropriate pleading and party joinder requirements. Standing and timing for court leave is discretionary and context-dependent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Trusts, Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory, Procedural Orders Regarding Pleading and Derivative Actions
- Outcome
- Interlocutory applications determined; amendments allowed; further procedural orders made regarding determination of leave for derivative action claims and further pleadings.
- Legal Topics
- ['derivative Action by Beneficiary' 'removal of Trustee' 'barnes V Addy Liability' 'equitable Compensation' 'trust Administration' 'statutory Derivative Actions Under Corporations Act 2001' 'pleading and Declaratory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Trusts, Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory, Procedural Orders Regarding Pleading and Derivative Actions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the beneficiary (Robert) may bring a derivative action in equity for the trust when the trustee is a company' 'Whether s 236(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 precludes such derivative claims' 'Procedural timing and requirements for court leave to bring a derivative action on behalf of a trust' 'Appropriate pleading and formulation of claims for equitable compensation, make good/accounting, and declaratory relief' 'Standing and joinder in trust and accessory liability claims']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 236(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 does not abolish the court's power to authorise a trust law derivative action where the trustee is a company; such actions stem from the court's administrative jurisdiction over trusts, require court authorisation (upon 'special circumstances'), and may proceed subject to appropriate pleading and party joinder requirements. Standing and timing for court leave is discretionary and context-dependent.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory applications determined; amendments allowed; further procedural orders made regarding determination of leave for derivative action claims and further pleadings.
Orders
- ['By 22 August 2022, Plaintiff to file and serve a motion for leave to bring derivative proceedings and serve proposed further amended pleading.' 'By 29 August 2022, Defendants to file and serve any evidence in respect of the leave motion.' 'By 2 September 2022, Plaintiff to file and serve submissions (max 15 pages)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment