South Johnstone Mill Ltd v Dennis and Scales [2007] FCA 1448
The absence of leave to commence derivative proceedings under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is not fatal to the court’s jurisdiction; leave may be granted nunc pro tunc if the statutory criteria are established. On the evidence, 31 of the applicants have standing as members or former members. The evidence satisfies s 237(2): the company will not bring proceedings (no directors; no assets), applicants act in good faith (willing to indemnify for costs, substantial shareholding), litigation is in company’s best interests (serious question to be tried regarding alleged sale at undervalue by Receivers, potential monetary benefit, applicants bear costs), and there is a serious...
- Parties
- Applicants: South Johnstone Mill Limited (ACN 101 695 575) & Others According to the Attached Schedule; First Respondents: Richard John Dennis & Michael Scales; Second Respondent: National Australia Bank (ACN 004 044 987)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations—derivative Action—interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Continue Derivative Proceedings Under S 237 Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
- Outcome
- Leave granted nunc pro tunc to 31 named applicants to proceed against Receivers; application against Bank dismissed; further orders as to cost and future directions to be settled by parties.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Standing of Applicants, Leave Nunc Pro Tunc, Duties of Receivers, Agency, Sale of Company Assets, Breach of Statutory Duties, Good Faith, Best Interests of Company, Evidence Admissibility (hearsay)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Johnstone Mill Limited (ACN 101 695 575) & Others According to the Attached Schedule
Applicants
Richard John Dennis & Michael Scales
First Respondents
National Australia Bank (ACN 004 044 987)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Corporations—derivative Action—interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Continue Derivative Proceedings Under S 237 Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave nunc pro tunc under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to continue proceedings commenced on behalf of the company
- 2 Whether relevant criteria in s 237(2) are satisfied (company not bringing proceedings, good faith, best interests, serious question to be tried, notice)
- 3 Whether leave nunc pro tunc is available for commenced proceedings without prior leave
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of leave to commence derivative proceedings under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is not fatal to the court’s jurisdiction; leave may be granted nunc pro tunc if the statutory criteria are established. On the evidence, 31 of the applicants have standing as members or former members. The evidence satisfies s 237(2): the company will not bring proceedings (no directors; no assets), applicants act in good faith (willing to indemnify for costs, substantial shareholding), litigation is in company’s best interests (serious question to be tried regarding alleged sale at undervalue by Receivers, potential monetary benefit, applicants bear costs), and there is a serious...
Court Disposition
Leave granted nunc pro tunc to 31 named applicants to proceed against Receivers; application against Bank dismissed; further orders as to cost and future directions to be settled by parties.
Orders
- The parties confer and file and serve within 7 days draft minutes of orders reflecting the reasons and in respect of costs and any further directions sought.
- The proceeding be adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment