In the matter of JR Enterprises Pty Ltd atf the JR Enterprises Unit Trust [2024] NSWSC 1671

In the matter of JR Enterprises Pty Ltd atf the JR Enterprises Unit Trust [2024] NSWSC 1671

The requirements of s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) have been satisfied: there is a serious question to be tried regarding whether the Judgment Debt remains outstanding, and the applicants are acting in good faith. Therefore, leave is granted to bring the proposed derivative suit on behalf of the Company.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Joy Rosalind Wylie; Second Plaintiff: Wylie's Securities Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Jeffrey Ronald Williams; Second Defendant: JR Enterprises Pty Ltd atf the JR Enterprises Unit Trust; Third Defendant: Jada Investments Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Bring a Derivative Action / Interlocutory – Leave Application
Outcome
Leave granted to bring derivative action.
Legal Topics
Derivative Actions, Enforcement of Judgment Debt, Set Off, Shareholder Remedies, Good Faith Requirement
Corporations Law Equity Derivative Actions Enforcement of Judgment Debt Set Off Shareholder Remedies Good Faith Requirement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joy Rosalind Wylie

First Plaintiff

Wylie's Securities Pty Ltd

Second Plaintiff

Jeffrey Ronald Williams

First Defendant

JR Enterprises Pty Ltd atf the JR Enterprises Unit Trust

Second Defendant

Jada Investments Pty Ltd

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Bring a Derivative Action / Interlocutory – Leave Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company to enforce a judgment debt
  2. 2 Whether there is a serious question to be tried regarding whether the judgment debt remains unpaid
  3. 3 Whether applicants are acting in good faith

Ratio Decidendi

The requirements of s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) have been satisfied: there is a serious question to be tried regarding whether the Judgment Debt remains outstanding, and the applicants are acting in good faith. Therefore, leave is granted to bring the proposed derivative suit on behalf of the Company.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to bring derivative action.

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs' undertaking to pay the Second Defendant's costs and to indemnify the Company is noted.
  • Pursuant to s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Plaintiffs are granted leave to bring and prosecute on behalf of and in the name of the Company the claim set out in the Further Points of Claim annexed to the Amended Interlocutory Process.