Tamer v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1292

Tamer v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1292

The proposed development is not compatible with the character of the local area as required by the SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 and relevant local planning controls, particularly due to the excessive bulk and height of rear two-storey elements, which are inconsistent with the prevailing and likely future single dwelling character. Clause 48(4) of the Blacktown LEP restricts two-storey developments to the street frontage. Numerical compliance with floor space ratio and setbacks does not override the requirement for design compatibility.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'affordable Rental Housing' 'character of Local Area' 'stormwater Drainage' 'medium Density Housing' 'public Interest']
['planning and Environment Law'] ['development Application' 'affordable Rental Housing' 'character of Local Area' 'stormwater Drainage' 'medium Density Housing' 'public Interest']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proposed affordable housing development is compatible with the character of the local area under State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 and local planning instruments' 'Whether the development complies with planning controls regarding height and placement of two-storey dwellings' 'Interpretation of clause 48(4) of the Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1988']

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed development is not compatible with the character of the local area as required by the SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 and relevant local planning controls, particularly due to the excessive bulk and height of rear two-storey elements, which are inconsistent with the prevailing and likely future single dwelling character. Clause 48(4) of the Blacktown LEP restricts two-storey developments to the street frontage. Numerical compliance with floor space ratio and setbacks does not override the requirement for design compatibility.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development consent for DA - 11 - 566 for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of an eight-unit affordable housing development at 91 Paull Street, Mount Druitt is refused.' 'The exhibits may be returned except for 2, 8 and A.']