R v Macdonald (3) [2016] NSWSC 1942
Because of the seriousness of the Dietrich application and the concern for the fair trial of Mr Macdonald and Mr Maitland, the interests of justice favoured permitting the material to be tendered, but only after an affidavit was filed identifying the material as the material provided on Mr Macdonald's behalf to the Legal Aid Commission; as the matter could not proceed without that affidavit, the hearing was adjourned part heard.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Criminal; Dietrich Application / Hearing of Notice of Motion; Adjourned Part Heard
- Outcome
- Hearing of Motion adjourned part heard to 20 April 2016
- Legal Topics
- ['dietrich Application' 'tender of Documents After Cross Examination' 're Examination' 'affidavit Identifying Provenance of Documents' 'fair Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Criminal; Dietrich Application / Hearing of Notice of Motion; Adjourned Part Heard
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether material sought to be tendered in re-examination after cross-examination should be rejected or admitted with leave to the Crown to cross-examine Mr Macdonald arising from that material.' "Whether an affidavit was required to establish that the material was the material provided on Mr Macdonald's behalf to the Legal Aid Commission."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because of the seriousness of the Dietrich application and the concern for the fair trial of Mr Macdonald and Mr Maitland, the interests of justice favoured permitting the material to be tendered, but only after an affidavit was filed identifying the material as the material provided on Mr Macdonald's behalf to the Legal Aid Commission; as the matter could not proceed without that affidavit, the hearing was adjourned part heard.
Court Disposition
Hearing of Motion adjourned part heard to 20 April 2016
Orders
- ["The hearing of Mr Macdonald's application in his notice of motion filed on 21 January 2016 is adjourned part heard before Adamson J to 9.15am on Wednesday 20 April 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment