R v Philip Wan Por LEUNG (No 3) [2009] NSWSC 450
The evidence is too speculative to support findings beyond reasonable doubt as to the act causing death, the requisite deliberate act, or intention for murder, or an unlawful and dangerous act for manslaughter. Accordingly, the jury must be directed to return verdicts of not guilty on both charges.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Directed Verdict Following Close of Crown Case
- Outcome
- Directed verdicts of not guilty on murder and manslaughter to be returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['directed Verdict' 'murder' 'manslaughter' 'no Case to Answer' 'inference in Circumstantial Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Directed Verdict Following Close of Crown Case
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is evidence upon which a jury properly directed could convict the accused of murder or manslaughter' 'Whether the evidence establishes the necessary act and intention for murder or the required unlawful and dangerous act for manslaughter']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence is too speculative to support findings beyond reasonable doubt as to the act causing death, the requisite deliberate act, or intention for murder, or an unlawful and dangerous act for manslaughter. Accordingly, the jury must be directed to return verdicts of not guilty on both charges.
Court Disposition
Directed verdicts of not guilty on murder and manslaughter to be returned.
Orders
- ['Jury directed to return verdict of not guilty to murder.' 'Jury directed to return verdict of not guilty to manslaughter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment