R v McNeil (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 758
Taking the Crown evidence at its highest, the descriptions of the punch, together with evidence that it was delivered by a large and powerful man in an aggressive and agitated state after earlier events, made it open to the jury to be satisfied that the accused intended to cause really serious bodily harm; therefore the evidence was not incapable of sustaining a murder verdict and the directed verdict application had to be refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial for Alleged Murder / Application for Directed Verdict of Not Guilty at the Close of the Crown Case
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['directed Verdict of Not Guilty' 'murder' 'intention to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm' 'evidence Taken at Its Highest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial for Alleged Murder / Application for Directed Verdict of Not Guilty at the Close of the Crown Case
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the evidence, taken at its highest for the Crown, was incapable of proving that the accused intended to cause really serious bodily harm at the time of the act causing death.' 'Whether a verdict of not guilty should be directed on the murder charge.']
Ratio Decidendi
Taking the Crown evidence at its highest, the descriptions of the punch, together with evidence that it was delivered by a large and powerful man in an aggressive and agitated state after earlier events, made it open to the jury to be satisfied that the accused intended to cause really serious bodily harm; therefore the evidence was not incapable of sustaining a murder verdict and the directed verdict application had to be refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ['Application for directed verdict refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment