Cohen v Sacks [2021] NSWSC 191
Having regard to the prior concern that vacating the hearing should not delay preparation and service of the statements of Mr and Mrs Cohen and Dr Sacks, and taking account of the plaintiffs' difficult financial position, the Court made directions setting timetables for subpoenas, evidence, expert conclaves, lay witness statements and the confirmed hearing date.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure; Professional Negligence / Directions for Further Conduct of Proceedings and Service of Evidence Before Hearing
- Outcome
- Directions made; hearing date of 28 February 2022 confirmed with a 5 week estimate.
- Legal Topics
- ['directions for Service of Evidence' 'subpoenas' 'quantum Evidence' 'expert Conclaves' 'lay Witness Statements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure; Professional Negligence / Directions for Further Conduct of Proceedings and Service of Evidence Before Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What directions should be made for the further conduct of the proceedings in anticipation of the hearing scheduled to commence on 28 February 2022.' 'Whether the plaintiffs should be permitted to limit the extent to which they are required to serve evidentiary statements because of impecuniosity and a desire to limit legal costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the prior concern that vacating the hearing should not delay preparation and service of the statements of Mr and Mrs Cohen and Dr Sacks, and taking account of the plaintiffs' difficult financial position, the Court made directions setting timetables for subpoenas, evidence, expert conclaves, lay witness statements and the confirmed hearing date.
Court Disposition
Directions made; hearing date of 28 February 2022 confirmed with a 5 week estimate.
Orders
- ['Plaintiffs to comply with the outstanding subpoenas by no later than 31 March 2021: paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 of the subpoena issued 21 May 2020 to the second plaintiff; paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 6 of the subpoena issued 12 October 2020 to the second plaintiff; paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 6 of the subpoena issued 12 October 2020 to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment