Carter, in the matter of Townsville Electronics Service Centre Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Sinclair [2019] FCA 2178
Judgment was entered against the third and fourth defendants as they caused the company to enter into an uncommercial transaction at significant undervalue, breaching their statutory duty of care and diligence (s 180(1)), and permitted the company to incur debts while insolvent (contravening s 588G). The court awarded damages corresponding with the value of the business and the losses resulting from insolvent trading.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Moira Kathleen Carter in her capacity as liquidator of Townsville Electronics Service Centre Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (ACN 160 469 036); Second Plaintiff: Townsville Electronics Service Centre Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (ACN 160 469 036); First Defendant: Bradley James Sinclair; Second Defendant: Catrina Louise Sinclair; Third Defendant: Roslyn Maree Sinclair; Fourth Defendant: Geoffrey Peter Sinclair
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Act Application (damages, Insolvency) / Judgment Following Application for Default Judgment; Orders as to Quantum and Further Directions
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for plaintiffs against third and fourth defendants in specified sums; application against first defendant adjourned; further orders as to interest and costs; orders published from Chambers.
- Legal Topics
- Director Duties, Uncommercial Transactions, Insolvent Trading, Damages/compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moira Kathleen Carter in her capacity as liquidator of Townsville Electronics Service Centre Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (ACN 160 469 036)
First Plaintiff
Townsville Electronics Service Centre Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (ACN 160 469 036)
Second Plaintiff
Bradley James Sinclair
First Defendant
Catrina Louise Sinclair
Second Defendant
Roslyn Maree Sinclair
Third Defendant
Geoffrey Peter Sinclair
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations Act Application (damages, Insolvency) / Judgment Following Application for Default Judgment; Orders as to Quantum and Further Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether directors entered into uncommercial transaction contravening Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether directors breached duty of care and diligence under section 180(1)
- 3 Whether directors are liable for insolvent trading under section 588G
Ratio Decidendi
Judgment was entered against the third and fourth defendants as they caused the company to enter into an uncommercial transaction at significant undervalue, breaching their statutory duty of care and diligence (s 180(1)), and permitted the company to incur debts while insolvent (contravening s 588G). The court awarded damages corresponding with the value of the business and the losses resulting from insolvent trading.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for plaintiffs against third and fourth defendants in specified sums; application against first defendant adjourned; further orders as to interest and costs; orders published from Chambers.
Orders
- Judgment for damages of $190,000.00 against third and fourth defendants for uncommercial transaction and breach of director duties.
- Damages for $107,793.33 for contravention of s 588G (insolvent trading) against third and fourth defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment