Carter v Chubb Insurance Australia Ltd [2024] FCA 1312
Given Mr Carter’s actual knowledge or reckless indifference to arrangements (including the creation and use of the slush fund, sham or fictitious invoicing, and payment of bribes or secret commissions to procurement managers of Orix customers), and his failure to disclose those matters or misrepresentations in the proposal, Chubb was entitled to deny indemnity under the Directors & Officers policy and require repayment of sums advanced. The Court found Carter’s awareness (or wilful blindness) as to the potential for claims to arise from these arrangements, combined with dishonesty in representations and omissions, constituted fraud for insurance law purposes and triggered the relevant...
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Claimant: John Joseph Carter; Second Defendant/second Cross Defendant: Chubb Insurance Australia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Coverage Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for insurer (Chubb); indemnity denied to Mr Carter; recovery of sums advanced ordered; cross-claim dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Directors and Officers Liability Policies, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Non Disclosure, Directors’ Statutory Duties, Bribery and Inducements, Civil and Criminal Liability Insurance, Duty of Disclosure Under Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (cth), Application of S 28 Insurance Contracts Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Joseph Carter
Plaintiff/cross Claimant
Chubb Insurance Australia Ltd
Second Defendant/second Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Coverage Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Carter fraudulently misrepresented and/or failed to disclose material facts when signing the insurance proposal for D&O cover
- 2 Whether Mr Carter had actual knowledge of arrangements that could give rise to a claim under the policy
- 3 Whether insurer Chubb is entitled to deny indemnity for defense costs and recover sums advanced to Mr Carter for defense costs
Ratio Decidendi
Given Mr Carter’s actual knowledge or reckless indifference to arrangements (including the creation and use of the slush fund, sham or fictitious invoicing, and payment of bribes or secret commissions to procurement managers of Orix customers), and his failure to disclose those matters or misrepresentations in the proposal, Chubb was entitled to deny indemnity under the Directors & Officers policy and require repayment of sums advanced. The Court found Carter’s awareness (or wilful blindness) as to the potential for claims to arise from these arrangements, combined with dishonesty in representations and omissions, constituted fraud for insurance law purposes and triggered the relevant...
Court Disposition
Judgment for insurer (Chubb); indemnity denied to Mr Carter; recovery of sums advanced ordered; cross-claim dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Parties to confer and submit draft orders to give effect to reasons for judgment by 28 November 2024 (NSD 437 of 2022).
- The second cross claim by Mr Carter against Chubb (filed 28 September 2020) dismissed (NSD 448 of 2022).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment