Alora Davies Developments 104 Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors v Raphael & Anor [2024] NSWSC 547
Mrs Raphael was a de facto director of the Company from 12 January 2018 to 6 May 2020; she and Mr Raphael breached directors' duties by allowing and participating in transactions that were unreasonable director-related and uncommercial, causing loss to the Company; both were liable for insolvent trading in respect of debt incurred while the Company was insolvent; APG was liable as recipient of voidable transactions; compensation and orders for payment were made accordingly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Process / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations and orders in respect of directors' duties and under Part 5.7B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) made against Defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ["directors' Duties" 'de Facto and Shadow Directors' 'insolvent Trading' 'uncommercial Transaction' 'unreasonable Director Related Transaction' 'breach of Fiduciary Duties' 'compensation Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Originating Process / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Second Defendant was a de facto or shadow director of the Company' 'Whether directors breached duties under ss 180–182 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether directors caused company to enter uncommercial transactions' 'Whether directors caused funds to be transferred to related entity absent any benefit to the company' 'Whether directors procured loan to the company while it was insolvent' 'Whether transactions amount to unfair preferences, uncommercial transactions, unreasonable-director related transactions and insolvent transactions under Part 5.7B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Raphael was a de facto director of the Company from 12 January 2018 to 6 May 2020; she and Mr Raphael breached directors' duties by allowing and participating in transactions that were unreasonable director-related and uncommercial, causing loss to the Company; both were liable for insolvent trading in respect of debt incurred while the Company was insolvent; APG was liable as recipient of voidable transactions; compensation and orders for payment were made accordingly.
Court Disposition
Declarations and orders in respect of directors' duties and under Part 5.7B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) made against Defendants.
Orders
- ['First Defendant to pay Company $300,000 for Keshian Debt' 'Second Defendant to pay Company $300,000 for Keshian Debt' 'Third Defendant to pay Company $75,757.48 (APG 11 July Payment)' 'First Defendant to pay Company $75,757.48 under s 1317H' 'Second Defendant to pay Company $75,757.48 under s 1317H' 'Third...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment