Marler, S.M. & Anor v. The Bankrupt [1985] FCA 675
Orders for discharge should be made because the trustee's report contained nothing adverse to the applicants, a substantial contribution had been made to the estate, the principal creditor did not oppose discharge, neither the trustee nor any other creditor opposed the applications, and no useful purpose would be served by continuing the destructive effect of the bankruptcy on the applicants and their children.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy
- Outcome
- Each applicant was discharged from bankruptcy.
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge From Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Orders' "trustee's Report" 'creditor Opposition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether each applicant should be discharged from bankruptcy despite the relatively short time since the sequestration orders were made.']
Ratio Decidendi
Orders for discharge should be made because the trustee's report contained nothing adverse to the applicants, a substantial contribution had been made to the estate, the principal creditor did not oppose discharge, neither the trustee nor any other creditor opposed the applications, and no useful purpose would be served by continuing the destructive effect of the bankruptcy on the applicants and their children.
Court Disposition
Each applicant was discharged from bankruptcy.
Orders
- ['Each applicant be discharged from bankruptcy.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment