Re Benda, R.C. v. Ex parte Benda, R.C. [1985] FCA 166
The bankrupt contracted debts provable in bankruptcy by undertaking personal guarantees, and did not demonstrate reasonable or probable grounds of expectation of being able to pay those debts if called upon. Therefore, s.150(6) precludes immediate discharge, but given the circumstances, a suspended discharge is justified.
- Parties
- Bankrupt / Applicant: Robert Charles Benda
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy
- Outcome
- Order of discharge granted, operation suspended until 8 August 1985.
- Legal Topics
- Discharge From Bankruptcy, Liability as Guarantor, Provable Debts, Exercise of Court's Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Charles Benda
Bankrupt / Applicant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bankrupt's conduct fell within para 150(6)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act
- 2 Whether the bankrupt's liability as guarantor was a 'debt provable in the bankruptcy'
- 3 Considerations relevant to exercising discretion under s.150 for early discharge
Ratio Decidendi
The bankrupt contracted debts provable in bankruptcy by undertaking personal guarantees, and did not demonstrate reasonable or probable grounds of expectation of being able to pay those debts if called upon. Therefore, s.150(6) precludes immediate discharge, but given the circumstances, a suspended discharge is justified.
Court Disposition
Order of discharge granted, operation suspended until 8 August 1985.
Orders
- Order of discharge of the bankruptcy of Robert Charles Benda, suspended until 8 August 1985.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment